出版科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (01): 82-.

• 青年学者论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

开放科学背景下开放同行评议模式体系及协同运行机理

  

  1. (华中师范大学信息管理学院,武汉,430079)(华中师范大学信息管理学院,武汉,430079)(武汉大学信息管理学院,
    武汉,430072)
  • 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-01-15
  • 作者简介:曾粤亮,管理学博士,华中师范大学信息管理学院讲师、硕士生导师 ;乔雨杉,华中师范大学信息管理 学院 2020 级本科生 ;郑汉,哲学博士,武汉大学信息管理学院副教授、硕士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系 ISTIC-Spring Nature 开放科学联合实验室开放基金项目“协同视角下开放同行评议生态系统构
    建及其在我国的实施策略研究”(IT2227)的研究成果。

Model System and Collaborative Operating Mechanism of Open Peer Review in  the Context of Open Science

  1. (School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079)(School
    of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079)(School of
    Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072)
  • Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-15

摘要:

结合文献调查、网络调查、案例分析,以主导主体作为首要划分标准,归纳开放同行评议模式,并基于协同理论从开放主体、开放形式、开放流程三方面剖析不同模式协同运行机理。现行开放同行评议模式可归纳为传统学术期刊、预印本平台、开放出版平台、开放评议社区四大类,根据各类别实践特点进一步细分为 10 种子模式。不同模式涉及不同的主体、形式、流程,其协同机理各异,学术共同体应结合各自需求与发展目标选择合适的评议模式并规范协同运行机制。

Abstract:

Through a combination of literature reviews, online surveys, and case analyses, this study classifies open peer review models based on the leading entities as the primary criterion. Utilizing synergy theory, the paper categorizes open peer review models and analyzes the collaborative operation mechanisms from three aspects: open entities, open forms, and open processes. The existing open peer review models can be categorized into four major types: traditional academic journals, preprint platforms, open publishing platforms, and open review communities. Further subtypes are derived based on the specific characteristics of each category, resulting in a total of 10 sub-models. These diverse models involve different entities, forms, and
processes, each with distinct collaborative mechanisms. Academic communities should choose an appropriate review model and standardize collaborative operation mechanisms based on their specific needs and development goals.

Key words:

中图分类号: