Publishing Journal ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1 ): 73-.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Online:
Published:
Supported by:
本文系2016年全国高等学校文科学报研究会立项项目(ZC08)的阶段性研究成果。
Abstract:
The paper sorts out 9 journal databses in China, to research their influences on science and technology journals. The results show that these databases are independent of each other but their journal data are significantly different. In addition, their journal selection strategy and methods are different with respect to the journal evaluation results. So their academic guidance is somewhat being debated. The results also show that some journal evaluation indexes in our evaluation system significantly lag behind the development of academic journals in China. The weights of some evaluation indexes are too large, such as paper quantity, the percentage of funded paper and soon. In this circumstance, the function of scientific journal evaluation may be distorted unexpectedly. This paper analyzes these problems and the induced risks in our current journal evaluation system, such as market-drive, under which the journal evaluation results may reversely determine academic evaluation. Based on these analysis, this paper proposes some suggestions to optimize evaluation system of journals, to promote the development of academic journal healthily and orderly.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: http://cbkx.whu.edu.cn/jwk3/cbkx/EN/
http://cbkx.whu.edu.cn/jwk3/cbkx/EN/Y2017/V25/I1 /73