出版科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 98-106.

• 青年学者论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

利益相关者视角下美国大学出版社人文社科专著OA多元主体协同研究

  

  1. (上海理工大学出版学院,上海,200093
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-17 修回日期:2026-03-31 出版日期:2026-05-08 发布日期:2026-05-09
  • 作者简介:程海燕,管理学博士,上海理工大学出版学院副教授、博士生导师;苏谨,上海理工大学出版学院2023级硕士生。

Study on the Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration on Open Access of Humanities and Social Sciences Monographs by American University Presses from the Perspective of Stakeholders

  1. School of Publishing, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093
  • Received:2025-09-17 Revised:2026-03-31 Online:2026-05-08 Published:2026-05-09

摘要: 从利益相关者视角下系统考察美国大学出版社人文社科专著的开放获取多元主体协同,旨在为中国大学出版社提供参考。首先剖析其开放获取发展的驱动因素:传统出版模式危机、教师职称评审需求、期刊开放获取成功示范以及拓宽学术传播的使命。进而选取加州大学出版社专著开放获取出版计划(Luminos)、迈向开放专著生态系统项目(TOME)和直接开放(D2O)三个代表性项目,分析其协作模式、成本分担与可持续机制。指出多方协作是美国实践的核心特征,体现在图书馆深度参与、基金会资金支持以及学术平台资源整合三个方面。基于美国大学出版经验,建议中国大学出版社应筹建全国性开放获取出版联盟,构建多元资金保障体系,推动社馆深度融合,并完善开放获取专著学术评价机制,以促进人文社科专著的开放传播与学术影响力提升。

Abstract:

This article systematically examines the multi-subject collaboration for open access of humanities and social sciences monographs in American university presses from the perspective of stakeholders, aiming to provide references for Chinese university presses. Firstly, it analyzes the driving factors of the development of OA: the crisis of traditional publishing models, the demand of teacher tenure review, the successful demonstration of OA journals, and the mission to broaden academic dissemination. Then, it selects Luminos, TOME, and D2O as representative projects, to analyze their collaboration models, cost-sharing, and sustainable mechanisms. The results suggest that multi-party collaboration is the core feature of the American practice, which is reflected in the deep participation of libraries, financial support from foundations, and the integration of academic platform resources. Based on the American experiences, this article proposes that Chinese university presses should establish a national OA publishing alliance, build a diversified financial guarantee system, promote the deep integration of presses and libraries, and improve the academic evaluation mechanism for OA monographs to promote the open dissemination and academic influence of humanities and social sciences monographs.

中图分类号: