出版科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 71-.

• 出版学 出版工作 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于儿童阅读差异的电子绘本与纸质绘本设计研究

  

  1. 上海理工大学出版印刷与艺术设计学院上海200093
  • 出版日期:2019-09-15 发布日期:2019-10-11
  • 作者简介:[ 作者简介 ] 方睿,工学博士,上海理工大学出版印刷与艺术设计学院副教授 ;张莎莎,哲学博士,上海理工大学出版印 刷与艺术设计学院讲师 ;魏雪琪,上海理工大学出版印刷与艺术设计学院 2015 级硕士生。

  • Online:2019-09-15 Published:2019-10-11

摘要:

[ 摘 要 ] 绘本一直被国际公认为是早期阅读的最佳材料当前市场上主要存在纸质绘本电子互动绘本
子无互动绘本三种不同形式的绘本值得思考的是这些绘本的设计是否真正有利于儿童对阅读内容的理解
因此本文试图深入研究以下三个问题 其一当阅读同样故事情节不同形式绘本时儿童对阅读内容的理
解程度是否存在差异 其二三种形式的绘本分别具体在哪一方面影响了儿童对绘本内容的理解 其三三种不
同形式的绘本分别采取何种设计策略更能有效地促进儿童对绘本内容的理解针对这些问题本文参照PIRLS
国际阅读素养进展文学类阅读试题编写了本研究阅读理解测试题并对 56 岁的学龄前儿童进行了实验
终结合实验结果和实验中对儿童阅读表现的观察分析了造成差异的原因并针对三种不同形式的绘本提出了
功能与视觉设计上的建议

关键词:

Abstract:

[Abstract] Picture books have been internationally recognized as the best material for early reading. At
present there are mainly three kinds of picture books namely picture book digital interactive picture book
and digital non interactive picture book. It is worth pondering whether the design of these picture books is
really conducive to childrens understanding of reading content. Therefore this article attempts to study
the following two questions first of all when reading the picture books which have same plot and different
forms is there any difference in childrens understanding of reading content? Secondly in which aspects
of the three forms of picture books influence childrens understanding? Thirdlyaccording to these reading
differences what kind of design strategy can promote childrens understanding? The experiment was
designed for preschool children aged 56. The reading comprehension test questions were compiled refer
toPIRLS”, and the reading comprehension test data were analyzed statistically. This paper analyzes the
causes of the difference based on childrens reading performance during the experiment and puts forward
suggestions on function and visual design.

Key words: