出版科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 58-.

• 出版学 出版工作 • 上一篇    下一篇

试论网络经营者的“ 避风港规则”

马瑞洁   

  1. ( 南开大学文学院,天津,300071)
  • 出版日期:2012-01-15 发布日期:2012-01-15
  • 作者简介:马瑞洁,南开大学文学院讲师。
  • 基金资助:

    本文系中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“ 数字出版发展现状与对策研究”( NKZXB10135)研究成果之一。

  • Online:2012-01-15 Published:2012-01-15

摘要:

针对不同类型的著作权侵权指控, 网络经营者可以提出不同的抗辩事由。 对于直接侵权的指控, 网
络经营者可以证明自己的行为不构成侵权, 而对于间接侵权的指控, 网络经营者可以主张自己符合法律规定
的五项条件, 即履行标识义务、 未改变相关复制品的信息、 主观无过错、 未从复制品的上传中直接获得利益
以及积极履行删除义务, 从而适用 “ 避风港规则”。

关键词: 网络经营者丨著作权 , 丨抗辩事由 , 丨&ldquo, 避风港规则&rdquo

Abstract:

The internet service providers can put forward different demur incidents in different lawsuit. In the direct infringement lawsuit, the providers should prove that their action is not an infringement, and in the indirect infringement lawsuit, the
providers can claim that they shall not be liable for compensation according to the “ safe harbor rule” by proving that: they
have publicized the information of the provider; they do not altered the work, performance, or audio-visual recording provided
to the service object; they do notknow and has no justified reason to know that the works provided by the service object has infringed
upon an other’ s right; they have not directly obtained economic benefits from the service object’ s provision of the work, performance, or audio-visual recording; after receiving the notification from the owner, they have deleted the work, performance,
or audio-visual regarded as infringing on the right of the owner according to the provisions of this regulation.