出版科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 44-.

• 编辑学 编辑工作 • 上一篇    下一篇

学术之忧,评价之忧:社科类学术期刊引文著录错误调查

王学青   

  1. 南通大学杂志社
  • 出版日期:2014-03-15 发布日期:2014-03-15
  • 作者简介:王学青,南通大学杂志社副编审。

Concerns about Academic Research and Academic Journals Evaluation:the Survey of the Errors of Quotation Description in Social Science Academic Journals

  • Online:2014-03-15 Published:2014-03-15

摘要:

在当前的学术期刊评价体制中,影响因子是最重要的指标,因而决定影响因子的“引文数据”受到办刊者空前的重视和追捧。为验证这些“引文数据”的客观性与科学性,本文选取CSSCI来源期刊中六种较优秀的学术期刊,对其中文期刊类引文的著录情况进行调查。调查结果显示,六种期刊的中文类期刊引文著录平均错误率高达25.6%,其中最高的达39.3%。引文著录错误的产生,和期刊编辑的工作责任心有一定关系,但根本原因还在于作者日益浮躁的科研作风,以及人为制造“引文”的不健康的办刊导向。应该让“引文评价”回到它原本的位置,重新确立以学者为中心的学术生产、传播与评价机制,如此才能最终构建一个良好的学术生态系统。

关键词: 社科类学术期刊, 引文著录, 引文评价, 学术风气

Abstract:

In the system of academic journals evaluation, the impact factor is the most important indicators. So the quotation data, as the determinant of impact factor have been chased by editors. In order to verify the quotation data,the paper investigates the quotation description of Chinese journals citations in six social sciences academic journals from CSSCI. According to the survey, their error rate is as high as 25.6%, the highest is 39.3%. The causes of the problems include blundering style of scientific research of the writers, attitude of the academic journals editors and the man made quotation data. Among them, in which the blundering style of scientific research of the writers is the main reason. The evaluation of quotation should come back its original position, so the good academic environment should be established.