出版科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 122-.

• 出版史 出版文化 • 上一篇    下一篇

总集的序跋与文学史权力
——以周必大《〈文苑英华〉序》为例

何水英   

  1. 凯里学院人文学院
  • 出版日期:2016-07-15 发布日期:2016-07-15
  • 作者简介:何水英,文学博士,凯里学院人文学院副教授。
  • 基金资助:

     本文系教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“《文苑英华》诗学批评研究”(14YJC751010)阶段性成果之一;
    本研究受凯里学院古代文学教学团队(JXTD201202)资助。

Prefaces and Postscripts of the Anthology and Their Literary Power: Focusing on Zhou
Bida’ s Preface of Wenyuan Yinghua

  • Online:2016-07-15 Published:2016-07-15

摘要:

总集的序跋中常隐藏着文学史权力,序跋通过文学史权力的运作改变总集文学史地位的现象也常见。
《文苑英华》《唐文粹》两者联系本不大,周必大在《〈文苑英华〉序》中提出“《唐文粹》铨择《文苑英华》”之说,
有意密切了两者关系,使《文苑英华》成为《唐文粹》母本。这种文学权力的运用属有意而为,明显提高了《文
苑英华》的价值,也改变了两总集的文学史地位。“铨择说”多为后人沿用,形成习惯看法,可见其文学史权力
影响的深远。

关键词: 序跋, 文学史权力, 《唐文粹》, 《文苑英华》, 铨择

Abstract:

The literary power is usually hidden in the prefaces and postscripts of anthology. This is a
common phenomenon, which the prefaces and postscripts change the status of the anthology through their
literary power. Tang Wencui and Wenyuan Yinghua didn’t have much contact, but Zhou Bida proposed
Tang Wencui selected out from Wenyuan Yinghua in preface of Wenyuan Yinghua . This view made Wenyuan
Yinghua and Tang Wencui be the mother-child relationship. This use of literary powers was intentional, it
significantly increased the value of Wenyuan Yinghua , but also changed the literary status of two anthologies.
Zhou Bida’s view was adopted later and became the prevailing view. It showed the far-reaching influence of
the literary power.